{"id":1281,"date":"2017-12-30T01:09:45","date_gmt":"2017-12-30T01:09:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/writing.wisc.edu\/wac\/?p=1281"},"modified":"2019-07-23T03:02:52","modified_gmt":"2019-07-23T03:02:52","slug":"grading-checklists-for-a-sequenced-assignment-in-engineering","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dept.writing.wisc.edu\/wac\/grading-checklists-for-a-sequenced-assignment-in-engineering\/","title":{"rendered":"Grading Checklists for a Sequenced Assignment in Engineering"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Dr. Elise Gold\n(Engineering)<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Paper 2: Proposal\/Annotated Bibliography<\/strong><\/p>

\u00a0<\/strong>AUTHOR: ____________________________________<\/strong><\/p>

Below you will find the various elements on which your paper will be evaluated. The Y (Yes), S (Somewhat), or N (No) by each item indicates how well you have done with each element. Items specifically needing work may be underlined or highlighted. Along with a grade, an overall evaluation follows, with a few major suggestions for improvement.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>

Cover Letter<\/strong><\/p>

____ explains purpose, focus, audience, use of logos, pathos, ethos<\/p>

____ discusses what\u2019s working best and worst in draft<\/p>

____ discusses what\u2019s new for the writer<\/p>

____ describes substantive revisions made between drafts<\/p>

____ uses appropriate tone<\/p>

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>

Title<\/strong><\/p>

____ accurately reflects paper<\/p>

____ is catchy<\/p>

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>

Introduction<\/strong><\/p>

____ grabs reader\u2019s attention<\/p>

____ sets stage and tone for paper<\/p>

____ presents good research focus question, conveys significance of topic, previews controversy\/debate<\/p>

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>

Thesis\/Concluding Statement<\/strong><\/p>

____ has effective specific thesis\/concluding statement<\/p>

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>

Development<\/strong><\/p>

____ effectively conveys why research topic is worth investigating<\/p>

____ discusses major topic areas well as personal interest, interest to class, synopsis of opinion, research plan<\/p>

____ avoids arguing a position to survey range of views<\/p>

____ provides good supportive evidence and details, using sources, and discusses their significance rather than merely reports them<\/p>

____ avoids redundancy in points, examples, etc.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>

Structure<\/strong><\/p>

____ uses good organizational strategies (follows through on proposal structure, organizes section discussions, especially\u00a0opinions, well)<\/p>

____ has unified paragraphs with effective topic sentences<\/p>

____ has clear logic\/coherence within\/between paragraphs\/sections; uses effective transitions (not mechanical)\u00a0between\/within paragraphs<\/p>

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>

Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>

____ recaps proposal effectively without repeating introduction<\/p>

____ is interesting and places issue in large context<\/p>

____ leaves reader with lasting impression about importance of research topic<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

Audience<\/strong><\/p>

____ clearly identifies audiences and their knowledge, values, and needs; uses appeals to logos, pathos, and ethos well.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>

Selection\/Use\/Citation of Sources and Annotated Bibliography<\/strong><\/p>

____ has adequate number of well selected sources (have currency, depth, range of views, credibility)<\/p>

____ uses sources well to build\/support argument not over-relying on them to form a pastiche; includes good, well-
\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 incorporated quotations, paraphrases, and summaries without plagiarism or inaccuracies<\/p>

____ provides correct APA in-text citations avoiding problems like info attributed to wrong source, info listed but no citation,
\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 incorrect page cited, no quotation marks around a direct quotation, etc.<\/p>

____ includes full, correct APA references to sources at end of paper<\/p>

____ has clear and developed annotations that summarize, evaluate the bias, and explain sources\u2019 usefulness<\/p>

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>

Style\/Sentences<\/strong><\/p>

____ employs variety in sentence structure and length<\/p>

____ achieves clarity and economy of language by avoiding wordiness, word choice problems, passive voice, nominalizations, jargon and technical language, clich\u00e9s<\/p>

____ has appropriate and consistent tone<\/p>

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>

Mechanics<\/strong><\/p>

____ has relatively few problems with punctuation, grammar, spelling; has proofread carefully<\/p>

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>

Format<\/strong><\/p>

_____ follows manuscript guidelines well (i.e., for title, spacing, typeface, pagination, headings for proposal format, etc.)<\/p>

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>

Revision<\/strong><\/p>

_____ demonstrates good\/excellent substantive revision between drafts on various levels\u2014thesis and subordinate ideas, development and support, organization and logic, style and mechanics<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

GRADE: _________\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 (Points lost for late and\/or incomplete rough draft or final draft, missing cover letter, missing\/incomplete mechanics checklist; annotated bibliography, in-text citations, and\/or reference list missing or incomplete; copies of sources missing, not highlighted, or not cross-referenced; sources used inaccurately, evidence of plagiarism? ________ )\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/strong><\/p>

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>

OVERALL EVALUATION:<\/strong><\/p>

\u00a0<\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>

PAPER 2\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 CRITIQUES OF PEERS\u2019 WORK<\/strong><\/p>

_____ provided well developed, substantive reviews of peers\u2019 writing<\/p>

_____ identified critical areas to work (higher-level writing issues like thesis, organization, support, development, etc., rather\u00a0 than lower-level writing issues like style, mechanics, proofreading)<\/p>

_____ included specific suggestions for improvement<\/p>

_____ included careful marginal comments<\/p>

_____ addressed peers directly with appropriate tone<\/p>

_____ provided positive as well as constructive feedback<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

GRADE: _________\u00a0 (Points lost for late or missing first draft, for not participating in peer review workshops?_____<\/strong><\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

  Dr. Elise Gold (Engineering) Paper 2: Proposal\/Annotated Bibliography  AUTHOR: ____________________________________ Below you will find the various elements on which your paper will be evaluated. The Y (Yes), S (Somewhat), or N (No) by each …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1281","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-responding-evaluating-grading"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dept.writing.wisc.edu\/wac\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1281","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dept.writing.wisc.edu\/wac\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dept.writing.wisc.edu\/wac\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dept.writing.wisc.edu\/wac\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dept.writing.wisc.edu\/wac\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1281"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/dept.writing.wisc.edu\/wac\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1281\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2304,"href":"https:\/\/dept.writing.wisc.edu\/wac\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1281\/revisions\/2304"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dept.writing.wisc.edu\/wac\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1281"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dept.writing.wisc.edu\/wac\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1281"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dept.writing.wisc.edu\/wac\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1281"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}